NEW DELHI: The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill proposing to lay down new norms and guidelines for judges of the higher judiciary would prefer the judges to keep mum when it comes to political issues. 

The Bill, slated to replace the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968 and due for placing before the Cabinet, sees two non-existent devils in the judiciary and has gone ahead in providing counter-mechanisms to them. 

It is an unwritten yet strictly followed code – judges of the High Courts or the Supreme Court never speak out on matters falling within the political domain. They also scrupulously adhere to the judicial discipline of not commenting on a judgment delivered by them. 

Yet, the new Bill proposes that it would be a misconduct if a judge gives an interview to the media on judgments delivered by him or participates in public debates or expresses views on political matters. 

Apart from these two unusual standards provided for in the Bill, there is a proposal to set up a scrutiny committee comprising judges in every high court to deal with complaints against judges. If the committee finds merit in any complaint it would forward it for investigation by a high-level Judicial Oversight Committee. 

If the latter committee, after investigation, feels action is needed to be taken against the erring judge, it will send a recommendation to the President to that effect, the Bill proposes. 

The Bill also incorporates a clause restricting the time to three months for a judge to deliver a judgment after conclusion of the arguments in a case. 

Source: Times of India

In a move expected to make family settlements and transfer of shares more taxing, the government plans to tighten anti-abuse provisions in the Income-tax Act, by including share sales in unlisted companies below fair market value under the ambit of regulations.

So far, income tax was imposed only on individuals or a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) who received, either free or below market value, property in excess of Rs 50,000. Now, the Finance Bill of 2010-11 has proposed to bring companies and firms that are recipients of such transfers under the ambit of the law.

The amendment will also include bullion under the definition of property, which currently includes shares and securities, land and buildings, jewellery, archaeological collections, drawings, paintings, sculpture or any other work of art.

The market valuation for the unlisted shares would be another task the company would have to achieve now, consultants said. The amendments to the Income-tax Act proposed in the Finance Bill would empower assessing officers to refer a case to a valuation officer.

The amendments related to transfer of shares and bullion to a company and firms will be effective from June 2010.

The Finance Bill has, however, proposed to keep mergers and acquisitions and business reorganisation outside the ambit of the proposed anti-abuse norms.

Tax department officials said the scope of the anti-abuse provisions was being widened because they found companies often sold shares in unlisted companies to other companies at a lower price to set off the losses against profits made from core operations and claim tax breaks.

North Block officials said the move will have implications for large Indian corporate houses that multi-tiered ownership structure.

In addition, tax consultants said that in most family arrangements, promoters transferred shares among themselves at book value, while the market value was higher.

“This is a usual practice and not intended to evade tax. But, now such transactions have been brought under the tax net,” said a professional at a leading consulting firm.

Similarly, cross-border transfer of shares among unlisted companies would also come under the tax net with effect from October 2009.

Tax experts suggest this provision may create complications for companies. “Transfer of shares is often hit by other provisions,” said Ketan Dalal, executive director and joint leader of tax practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers .

He says the new provisions could overlap with cases of deemed dividend tax and, in the case of cross-border transactions, transfer pricing provisions.

Source: Business Standard

The Finance Ministry said that the proposed Goods and Services Tax rate is likely to be higher than 12 per cent, which was suggested by the task force set up by the 13 Finance Commission.  The Finance Commission (task force) had recommended an overall GST rate of 12 per cent “but it is likely to be higher than that”, Revenue Secretary Sunil Mitra said at a CII seminar at New Delhi. He, however, clarified that he is not talking about the Central GST but the combined tax at the Union and state governments’ level.

The task force had recommended 5% GST rate at the Central level and 7% at the state level.

GST will replace most the indirect taxes at central and states levels like service tax, excise duty, VAT, and local levies.

 Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com

June Examination dates: 11 to 18 June, 2010

Date of Submission of Examination form without late fee: 10 April 2010

Date of Submission of Examination form with late fee: 20 April 2010

Source: icwai.org

The EIRC OF ICWAI is organizing the 51st National Cost Convention of the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India (ICWAI) on the theme “CMAs IN NATION BUILDING – TODAY & TOMORROW”. The event will be held on 23rd – 25th of April 2010 at Fortune Park Panchwati, Kolkata, Santragachi, Howrah.

The Convention is expecte d to bring up the gap analysis in the profession and will be addressed by professionals, top most officials of PSUs, corporate leaders, financial institutions and members in practice and industry, in addition to, interaction with industrialist of different sectors.

Source: icwai.org

CSoC Mission: “To be an online guide to budding corporate professionals, to help them with knowledge resources and make them aware of latest profession related & corporate updates.” CSoC Vision: “To be a role-model among online knowledge portals, and create a brand of excellence in pure knowledge sharing with disciple and decorum, in tune with global standards”.

RSS Latest from CSoC Discussion Forum:

  • TRAINING GUIDANCE
    HELLO FRIENDS I AM A CS TRAINEE YOU CAN SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ME.... AND ALSO YOU CAN ASK ME FOR YOUR TRAINING DOUBTS TAKE CARE […]
    CS PREETI CHAUHAN
  • CS EXECUTIVE PROGRAME RESPONSE SHEET
    Hi all, can any one please send me solved response sheet for CS Executive program. My Mail ID is Challashravan@yahoo.co.in […]
    Challa
  • cs executive notes
    plz send me cs executive notes to ma mail id nazima.perky@gmail.com […]
    nazima
  • urgent ( cs professional postel june 2012 papers )
    can any body please send me solved cs professional postel june 2012 papers ( test papers )... i have to send it before 28th feb... i have very less time ... please help me.. if any body has then send it me on my mail :- mayank8382@yahoo.com thanks in advance. […]
    mayank8382
  • Need CC Paper for CS Professional
    Hello, Pls send CC paper (Postal) for CS Professional if anybody have. my e-mail ID is - mnt_agarwal@yahoo.co.in […]
    mnt_agarwal
  • Training overseas
    Dear Friends, I wanted to know whether we can do our training or articleship abroad as I would be moving to Abudhabi next year after my executive exams. Can somebody please give me any suggestions as i want to do the training along with preparing for Finals. Thanks […]
    Rashmi Pisharody
  • cs scanner for executive
    can anyone tell me which scanner i prefer for preparation of executive programme? […]
    sandeepsrj
  • cs attempt for june 2012
    I want to give both the modules for june2012. How could I prepare for it? Can anyone tell me about How could I prepare for this? […]
    sandeepsrj

CSoC Definitions:

CSoC Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate Governance is the culture of managing a corporate entity, whereby compliance with law, procedures, systems, code of ethics and best practices are ensured thus adding value to shareholders and contributing to the well being of all stakeholders.”


CSoC Definition of Compliance Management:
“Compliance Management is that part of management which specializes in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, code of conduct, management polices, systems and secretarial standards in order to achieve the organization objectives legally, ethically and transparently.”

RSS Case Laws

  • Companies Act – Section 560(6)
    R.G.SALES PVT LTD & ANR v. GIRDHARILAL PARASRAMPURIA & ANR [CAL] APO No.149 of 2011 with CP No.448 of 2010 Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta & Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J. [Decided on 15.06.2011] Companies Act – Section 560(6) – Company was struck of the register by ROC – An eviction suit was pending against the company – […]
  • Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest
    UNION OF INDIA v. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING & LEASING (P) LTD [SC] Civil Appeal No. 2005 of 2007, P Sathasivam & A.K. Patnaik, JJ. [Decided on 12/07/2011] Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest – Arbitrator awarded interest – Whether tenable – Held, No Brief facts: On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a […]
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956
    S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [DEL] W.P.(C) 2393/2010 S. MURALIDHAR [Decided on 21.04.2011 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956 – Increase in authorized share capital – Whether stamp duty is payable on the increased quantum – Held, No. Brief facts: The Petitioner, […]
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930
    RAVINDER RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. [SC] Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S).10364/2006 Altamas Kabir, J. & C Joseph, J[Decided on 10/02/2011]   Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Booking of car – Before delivery of the car the price of the car increased due to increase […]
  • Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N)
    Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N) – Illegal termination- Employer fails to lead evidence that the complainants are not workmen – Award favouring the workmen passed by the industrial adjudicator – Whether correct – Held, yes.  Brief facts: The petitioner employer by these writ petitions impugns separate but identical awards of the Industrial Adjud […]
© 2009 CS Students' Online Club. Promoted by: CIER. CSoC launched on 18th June, 2009
Knowledge Partner: SVJS Knowledge Lab. Pvt. Ltd.
Advisors: BMP Part & Fell. - Portal Managed by: miniMedia
CS Students Online Club & the Club Logo are the registered trademarks of the Club promoters.
Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha