Having regard to the imperative of accelerating the flow of credit to the Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) sector, which is very critical for inclusive and equitable growth and larger economic empowerment, it was announced in the (paragraph 114) Annual Policy statement for 2009-10 “to ask the Standing Advisory Committee on MSEs to review the Credit Guarantee Scheme so as to make it more effective.”  Following this announcement, a working group was constituted under the Chairmanship of Shri V.K. Sharma, Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India. The terms of reference of the Group were:

 i) to review the working of the Credit Guarantee Scheme and to suggest measures to enhance its usage and facilitate increased flow of collateral free loans to MSEs;

ii) to make suggestions to simplify the existing procedures and requirements for obtaining cover and invoking guarantee claims under CGTMSE Scheme;

iii) to examine the feasibility of a whole turnover guarantee for the MSE portfolio; and

 iv) any other issues.

Chairman and Managing Director of SIDBI, representatives of the Government of India, banks and IBA were Members of the Working Group and the Chief Executive Officer of DICGC was a Special Invitee.

Mandatory doubling of the limit for collateral free loans to micro and small enterprises (MSEs) sector to Rs.10 lakh from the present Rs. 5 lakh, increase in the extent of guarantee cover, absorption of guarantee fees for the collateral free loans by CGTMSE subject to certain conditions, lower guarantee fees for women entrepreneurs and enterprises in the North-East, simplification of procedure  for filing claims with CGTMSE and increasing awareness about the scheme are some of the recommendations of the Working Group set up to review the Credit Guarantee Scheme of the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust. The setting up of the Working Group was announced in the (paragraph 114) Annual Policy statement for 2009-10. The Report was released by the Hon’ble Finance Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee on March 6, 2010 as part of the Platinum Jubilee celebrations of the Reserve Bank.

The main recommendations of the Group are:

1. Collateral free loans

The limit for collateral free loans to the MSE sector to be increased from the present level of Rs. 5 lakh to Rs.10 lakh and it be made mandatory for banks.

2. Guarantee Fee

a) The guarantee fee for collateral free loans upto Rs.10 lakh to Micro Enterprises to be borne/ absorbed by the CGTMSE subject to the proviso that the Trust be free to adjust the guarantee fee both downwards and upwards based on the modelling of the dynamically evolving distribution of claims. This will ensure that the CGTMSE remains self-financing and self-sustaining in the long-term.

b) CGTMSE may charge composite, all-in guarantee fee of 1% p.a. and appropriately realign downwards the guarantee fees chargeable to women entrepreneurs, Micro enterprises and units located in North-Eastern Region including Sikkim. The Trust may also annually review the Guarantee Fee to be charged on the basis of the pricing/valuation model suggested by the Group.

c) The Government of India to consider exempting both guarantee fee and the income on investments of the Trust from Income Tax, as is the practice internationally for such non-profit credit guarantee organisations.

3. Extent of the Guarantee Cover

Consistent with the recommendation for enhancement of the collateral free loan limit from Rs. 5 lakh to Rs. 10 lakh, the guarantee cover upto 85% of the amount in default to be made applicable to credit facilities to Micro Enterprises upto Rs 10 lakh.  However, the extent of guarantee cover for credit facilities above Rs.10 lakh upto Rs.50 lakh will be 75% and for credit facilities in excess of Rs.50 lakh upto Rs.1 crore will be 75% upto Rs. 50 lakh and 50% of the amount in excess of Rs. 50 lakh, as per the extant provisions of the Scheme.

4. Corpus of the Guarantee Trust

If the CGTMSE uses the conceptually rigorous and technically robust model suggested by the Group, there is only 0.1 per cent chance that the Fund will be touched. However, as and when required, the Government of India may contribute to the Fund’s corpus.

5. Simplification of Procedure

a) At present banks have to initiate legal action in all cases before filing claim with the Guarantee Trust. With a view to simplifying the procedure for filing claims in respect of small loan accounts, initiation of legal proceedings as a pre-condition for invoking of guarantees  to be waived for credit facilities upto Rs.50,000-.

b) Member Lending Institutions (MLIs) of the Trust may be allowed to invoke guarantee within a period of two years from the date of classification of the account as NPA instead of the present prescription of within one year.

c) The final claim to be paid by the Trust to the MLIs after three years of obtaining of decree of recovery instead of the present procedure of releasing the final claim by the Trust only after the decree of recovery becomes time barred i.e. 12 years after obtaining decree.

6. Awareness about the Scheme 

The Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of banks should assume complete and total ownership in the matter of strongly encouraging the branch level functionaries to avail of the CGS cover, including making performance in this regard a criterion in the evaluation of their field staff.

The implementation of the Recommendations of the Working Group should result in enhanced usage of the Guarantee Scheme and facilitate increase in quality and quantity of credit to the presently included, as well as excluded, MSEs, leading eventually, to sustainable inclusive growth.

Source: rbi.org.in

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • Twitter

CSoC Mission: “To be an online guide to budding corporate professionals, to help them with knowledge resources and make them aware of latest profession related & corporate updates.” CSoC Vision: “To be a role-model among online knowledge portals, and create a brand of excellence in pure knowledge sharing with disciple and decorum, in tune with global standards”.

RSS Latest from CSoC Discussion Forum:

  • TRAINING GUIDANCE
    HELLO FRIENDS I AM A CS TRAINEE YOU CAN SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ME.... AND ALSO YOU CAN ASK ME FOR YOUR TRAINING DOUBTS TAKE CARE […]
    CS PREETI CHAUHAN
  • CS EXECUTIVE PROGRAME RESPONSE SHEET
    Hi all, can any one please send me solved response sheet for CS Executive program. My Mail ID is Challashravan@yahoo.co.in […]
    Challa
  • cs executive notes
    plz send me cs executive notes to ma mail id nazima.perky@gmail.com […]
    nazima
  • urgent ( cs professional postel june 2012 papers )
    can any body please send me solved cs professional postel june 2012 papers ( test papers )... i have to send it before 28th feb... i have very less time ... please help me.. if any body has then send it me on my mail :- mayank8382@yahoo.com thanks in advance. […]
    mayank8382
  • Need CC Paper for CS Professional
    Hello, Pls send CC paper (Postal) for CS Professional if anybody have. my e-mail ID is - mnt_agarwal@yahoo.co.in […]
    mnt_agarwal
  • Training overseas
    Dear Friends, I wanted to know whether we can do our training or articleship abroad as I would be moving to Abudhabi next year after my executive exams. Can somebody please give me any suggestions as i want to do the training along with preparing for Finals. Thanks […]
    Rashmi Pisharody
  • cs scanner for executive
    can anyone tell me which scanner i prefer for preparation of executive programme? […]
    sandeepsrj
  • cs attempt for june 2012
    I want to give both the modules for june2012. How could I prepare for it? Can anyone tell me about How could I prepare for this? […]
    sandeepsrj

CSoC Definitions:

CSoC Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate Governance is the culture of managing a corporate entity, whereby compliance with law, procedures, systems, code of ethics and best practices are ensured thus adding value to shareholders and contributing to the well being of all stakeholders.”


CSoC Definition of Compliance Management:
“Compliance Management is that part of management which specializes in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, code of conduct, management polices, systems and secretarial standards in order to achieve the organization objectives legally, ethically and transparently.”

RSS Case Laws

  • Companies Act – Section 560(6)
    R.G.SALES PVT LTD & ANR v. GIRDHARILAL PARASRAMPURIA & ANR [CAL] APO No.149 of 2011 with CP No.448 of 2010 Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta & Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J. [Decided on 15.06.2011] Companies Act – Section 560(6) – Company was struck of the register by ROC – An eviction suit was pending against the company – […]
  • Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest
    UNION OF INDIA v. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING & LEASING (P) LTD [SC] Civil Appeal No. 2005 of 2007, P Sathasivam & A.K. Patnaik, JJ. [Decided on 12/07/2011] Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest – Arbitrator awarded interest – Whether tenable – Held, No Brief facts: On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a […]
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956
    S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [DEL] W.P.(C) 2393/2010 S. MURALIDHAR [Decided on 21.04.2011 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956 – Increase in authorized share capital – Whether stamp duty is payable on the increased quantum – Held, No. Brief facts: The Petitioner, […]
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930
    RAVINDER RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. [SC] Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S).10364/2006 Altamas Kabir, J. & C Joseph, J[Decided on 10/02/2011]   Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Booking of car – Before delivery of the car the price of the car increased due to increase […]
  • Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N)
    Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N) – Illegal termination- Employer fails to lead evidence that the complainants are not workmen – Award favouring the workmen passed by the industrial adjudicator – Whether correct – Held, yes.  Brief facts: The petitioner employer by these writ petitions impugns separate but identical awards of the Industrial Adjud […]
© 2009 CS Students' Online Club. Promoted by: CIER. CSoC launched on 18th June, 2009
Knowledge Partner: SVJS Knowledge Lab. Pvt. Ltd.
Advisors: BMP Part & Fell. - Portal Managed by: miniMedia
CS Students Online Club & the Club Logo are the registered trademarks of the Club promoters.
Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha