ICSI releases Draft Referencer on Secretarial Audit.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India has released CORPORATE GOVERNANCE VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES 2009. The preamble to Guidelines states that “These guidelines provide for a set of good practices which may be voluntarily adopted by the Public companies. Private companies, particularly the bigger ones, may also like to adopt these guidelines.”

The Guidelines, amongst other things, recommended, the introduction of Secretarial Audit. Para V of the Guidelines states that:

“Since the Board has the overarching responsibility of ensuring transparent, ethical and responsible governance of the company, it is important that the Board processes and compliance mechanisms of the company are robust. To ensure this, the companies may get the Secretarial Audit conducted by a competent professional. The Board should give its comments on the Secretarial Audit in its report to the shareholders.”

Companies, which do not adopt these guidelines, either fully or partially, are expected to inform their shareholders about the reasons for not adopting these Guidelines. This is in consonance with the popular doctrine of “Comply or Explain”.

Please Read / Download a copy of Exposure Draft Here

Consultancy firm Deloitte has said more than half of the business professionals covered in its new survey feel that more corporate financial statement frauds will be uncovered in 2010 and 2011 than the last three years.

According to the survey of around 2,100 business professionals, 56 per cent of the respondents think more financial statement frauds will be unearthed this year and in 2011 than the last three years combined.

Almost half of those surveyed (46 per cent) point to the recession as the reason more financial statement fraud will be uncovered,” the survey stated. Moreover, it is getting harder to assess financial statement fraud risks because of changes in the risk environment, it said.

Around 25 per cent of the respondents in the Deloitte survey believed that the action most useful to their organization for mitigating the risk of financial statement fraud would be training staff to recognize such manipulation.

The survey also found that more than one—third (38 per cent) of the respondents believe that in the current economic environment, revenue manipulation is the type of financial statement fraud which is of greatest concern.

Meanwhile, 18 per cent of the respondents cited ‘big bath’ write—offs and 14 per cent cited manipulation for debt covenant compliance purposes as the biggest threat.

Fifty per cent of the business professionals surveyed said the financial services industry would have the greatest percentage increase in financial statement fraud in 2010, compared to 2009.

This was followed by technology, media and telecom (14 per cent), consumer business (12 per cent), life science and healthcare (10 per cent) and manufacturing (six per cent), the study revealed.

Source: business.gov.in

A key parliamentary panel has said that the exemptions and deductions provided under the current tax laws were loaded in favour of corporates and big taxpayers, providing support to the proposed direct taxes code that has suggested replacing all profit-linked exemptions with investment-linked ones. The standing committee on finance also suggested a review of the tax and duty exemptions to special economic zones or SEZs

India’s direct tax regime provides a large number of exemptions and deductions because of which the incidence of tax on corporates is lot lower than the nominal rate of 30.9%, including the education cess. The effective tax rate for corporates in 2008-09 was 22.78% while that for the biggest companies or those profit before tax in excess of Rs 500 crore only 22%.

The direct taxes code, a draft of which is being debated in the government, has proposed a flat 25% tax on corporates but suggested removing all profit-based exemptions. The code is expected to be adopted from the next fiscal. The code has also suggested the same regime for special economic zones. The commerce ministry has been arguing that the current regime for SEZs continue. The committee has asked the government to set up a study group to review the desirability of tax and duty exemptions to SEZs to bring out the costs of tax exemptions vis-à-vis’ the benefits. The panel made it clear that the policy on exemptions should not just reduce the percentage of tax foregone but at the same time encourage household savings, foster social security and generally favour small taxpayers.The committee pointed that the tax concessions and exemptions provided in general have been huge and phenomenal amounting to more than half of the total direct tax collections in 2009-10. “The committee notes with concern that the huge amount of revenue lost to the exchequer to more than Rs 1,50,000 crore.”

In fact, if the aggregate exemptions in both direct and indirect taxes is taken into account, it works out to a massive Rs 5,02,299 crore in 2009-10 which is almost 80% of the total revenue collections.

Source: The Economic Times

INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA ON 28TH APRIL, 2010 

Bill No. XXVII of 2010 

THE COMPANY SECRETARIES ( AMENDMENT ) BILL, 2010

 

A BILL further to amend the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. 

Be it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-first Year of the Republic of India as follows :-

 Short title and commencement 

1.   (1)  This Act may be called the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Act, 2010. 

      (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint. 

Amendment of Section 2 

2.   In the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980)  (hereinafter referred to as the Principal Act), in   section 2, sub-section (1)  — 

(i)      after clause (f), the following clause shall be inserted, namely :- 

‘(fa) “firm” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (9 of 1932), and includes, —-     

(i)      the limited liability partnership as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of    section 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009); or

 (ii)        the sole proprietorship, 

registered with the Institute;’; 

    (ii)    after clause (ga), the following clauses shall be inserted, namely :- 

(gb)  “partner” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (9 of 1932) or in clause (q) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 of 2009), as the case may be;

(gc)  “partnership” means — 

(A)  a partnership as defined in section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act,   1932 (9 of 1932); or 

(B)  a limited liability partnership which has no company as its partner;’;  

(iii)               after clause (j),  the following clause shall be inserted, namely  :- 

‘(jj)’ “sole proprietorship” means an individual who engages himself in the practice of the profession of the Company Secretaries or offers to perform services referred to in clause (b) to (f) of sub-section (2);’; 

Amendment of section 26

3.     In section 26 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1), the following Explanation shall be inserted, namely :- 

         ‘Explanation . – For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the “company” shall include any limited liability partnership which has company as its partner for the purposes of this section.’.

STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS 

The Company Secretaries Act, 1980 has been enacted to make provisions for the regulation of the profession of the company secretaries.  The said Act was amended in 2006 by the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Act, 2006, inter alia, to enable the members of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India to form multi-disciplinary firms and offer multi-professional services in a competitive and commercial manner. 

2.         Subsequently, the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 has been enacted to make provisions for the formation and regulation of limited liability partnerships and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.  The limited liability partnership will be a separate legal entity, liable to the full extent of its assets, with the liability of the partners being limited to their agreed contribution in the limited liability partnership which may be of tangible or intangible nature or both tangible and intangible in nature. 

3.         It is proposed to extend the benefits of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 to the firms of company secretaries under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 and to amend the provisions of the said Act. 

4.         Section 2 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 inter alia provides that a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India shall be deemed to be in practice when individually or in partnership with one or more members of the Institute in practice or in partnership with members of such other recognized professions as may be prescribed. 

5.         The Company Secretaries (Amendment) Bill, 2010 proposes to amend the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 to apply certain provisions of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 to the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 in order to allow the members of the professional institute governed by the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 to form the limited liability partnership and insert new definitions of “firm”, “partner”, “partnership” and “sole proprietorship” for the said purpose.

 6.         The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.

The government is drafting legislation to mandate producers of electronic equipment to ensure that e-waste is collected, transported to specific recycling units, and safely disposed of. Failure to do so would invite fines as prescribed under the existing Environment Protection Act, or potential closure of the industrial unit. Producers of such equipment will also have to annually apprise the environment ministry of the e-waste collected, the rules propose.

Forthcoming legislation to manage electronic waste could increase the cost of electronic goods as well as place the onus on consumers to ensure that their discarded computers and defunct television sets are given away or sold only to authorized scrap dealers. While this could greatly boost the nascent organized e-waste recycling sector, it could also mean higher levels of scrutiny by pollution control agencies.

Currently, 85-90% of India’s e-waste generated largely from outdated cellphones to computer hardware is handled by the informal sector. This waste is broken down and recycled, generally under hazardous as well as environmentally damaging conditions. Precious metals such as gold, copper and platinum are extracted from this and ploughed back into the industry. However, plastics and other non-biodegradable materials tend to accumulate.

Bulk consumers of electrical and electronic equipment, including corporate houses as well as government offices, are likely to be most impacted, because they would have to proactively ensure that their heavy electrical equipment as well as lighter electronic goods are no longer auctioned off to the grey market, but given to companies registered and accredited by the state pollution control boards.

The organized e-waste recycling sector is currently operating far below installed capacity. Few organizations in India have equipment such as specialized incinerators to dispose of such waste. Currently only ten companies have registered with state and central level pollution control boards across the country.

According to a United Nations report, India’s e-waste from old computers will jump 500% from 2007 levels by 2020, whereas South Africa and China will witness a 200-400% rise in computer-related waste. Waste from rapidly growing mobile telephony in India will grow 18 times from the 2007 levels, a period during which China is estimated to see a sevenfold rise.

Source: business.gov.in

The Development Committee of the World Bank, in its meeting held on 25th April, 2010 at Washington DC, took historic decisions relating to increasing the financial capacity of the Bank and enhancing the role of developing countries in its governance. These decisions would be of great benefit to India – both as a borrower from and as a shareholder of the Bank.

The changes in the shareholding structure of the Bank would make India one of the important shareholders in the Bank. While there is an overall shift of 3% vote share to developing countries bringing their total vote share to 47%, India would now be the 7th largest shareholder in the Bank. In recognition of the global economic changes that are taking place, the voting power of countries like India, China, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey has increased while that of some of the major European and other countries that have traditionally dominated international finance like UK, France, Germany, the Nordic and Benelux countries, Japan, Australia and Canada, has gone down. As a result of this change, India would go ahead of Russia, Canada, Australia, Italy and Saudi Arabia in voting power.

These changes reflect the rapid growth of the Indian economy in the past decade and its rising economic weight in global affairs. The Bank has also agreed to review its shareholding five years hence and as India’s economy grows further, this should lead to a further improvement in India’s relative importance.

India’s shareholding in the Bank had been declining since the 1970s and this trend has been reversed for the first time in a generation.

Source: Press Information Bureau

The Finance Ministry has come out with ‘Saral-II’, the new income tax returns form, that seeks to make tax filing easy on the assesses and gather information on TDS paid on salary and interest. The Saral-II, a two-page form, was mentioned by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee in his Budget speech for 2010-11. “This form will enable individuals to enter relevant [Read More...]

April is the cruelest month in some poor soul’s life who bungle on their tax planning every year. Mostly, they get a pay cheque which is a fraction of  its usual size in April as they always submit a list of their tax-saving measures to the office, but never manages to submit the relevant papers on time.No wonder, they make [Read More...]

Chairman of a Company in India Source: Article in The Business Line dated Thursday, Jun 28, 2007 Much is being made about the chairman of a company. As it stands, the company law does not recognise the post of chairman. There are no mandatory provisions for such an office. The term ‘company chairman’ is an anachronism. The legal provisions reveal [Read More...]

Holding companies of business conglomerates will come under the radar of the Reserve Bank of India.  Business groups will have to register these investment firms holding shares on behalf of promoters with the central bank. These entities, which unlike non-banking finance companies do not accept deposits or trade, will be known as core investment companies (CICs) with a new set [Read More...]

CSoC Mission: “To be an online guide to budding corporate professionals, to help them with knowledge resources and make them aware of latest profession related & corporate updates.” CSoC Vision: “To be a role-model among online knowledge portals, and create a brand of excellence in pure knowledge sharing with disciple and decorum, in tune with global standards”.

RSS Latest from CSoC Discussion Forum:

  • TRAINING GUIDANCE
    HELLO FRIENDS I AM A CS TRAINEE YOU CAN SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ME.... AND ALSO YOU CAN ASK ME FOR YOUR TRAINING DOUBTS TAKE CARE […]
    CS PREETI CHAUHAN
  • CS EXECUTIVE PROGRAME RESPONSE SHEET
    Hi all, can any one please send me solved response sheet for CS Executive program. My Mail ID is Challashravan@yahoo.co.in […]
    Challa
  • cs executive notes
    plz send me cs executive notes to ma mail id nazima.perky@gmail.com […]
    nazima
  • urgent ( cs professional postel june 2012 papers )
    can any body please send me solved cs professional postel june 2012 papers ( test papers )... i have to send it before 28th feb... i have very less time ... please help me.. if any body has then send it me on my mail :- mayank8382@yahoo.com thanks in advance. […]
    mayank8382
  • Need CC Paper for CS Professional
    Hello, Pls send CC paper (Postal) for CS Professional if anybody have. my e-mail ID is - mnt_agarwal@yahoo.co.in […]
    mnt_agarwal
  • Training overseas
    Dear Friends, I wanted to know whether we can do our training or articleship abroad as I would be moving to Abudhabi next year after my executive exams. Can somebody please give me any suggestions as i want to do the training along with preparing for Finals. Thanks […]
    Rashmi Pisharody
  • cs scanner for executive
    can anyone tell me which scanner i prefer for preparation of executive programme? […]
    sandeepsrj
  • cs attempt for june 2012
    I want to give both the modules for june2012. How could I prepare for it? Can anyone tell me about How could I prepare for this? […]
    sandeepsrj

CSoC Definitions:

CSoC Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate Governance is the culture of managing a corporate entity, whereby compliance with law, procedures, systems, code of ethics and best practices are ensured thus adding value to shareholders and contributing to the well being of all stakeholders.”


CSoC Definition of Compliance Management:
“Compliance Management is that part of management which specializes in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, code of conduct, management polices, systems and secretarial standards in order to achieve the organization objectives legally, ethically and transparently.”

RSS Case Laws

  • Companies Act – Section 560(6)
    R.G.SALES PVT LTD & ANR v. GIRDHARILAL PARASRAMPURIA & ANR [CAL] APO No.149 of 2011 with CP No.448 of 2010 Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta & Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J. [Decided on 15.06.2011] Companies Act – Section 560(6) – Company was struck of the register by ROC – An eviction suit was pending against the company – […]
  • Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest
    UNION OF INDIA v. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING & LEASING (P) LTD [SC] Civil Appeal No. 2005 of 2007, P Sathasivam & A.K. Patnaik, JJ. [Decided on 12/07/2011] Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest – Arbitrator awarded interest – Whether tenable – Held, No Brief facts: On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a […]
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956
    S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [DEL] W.P.(C) 2393/2010 S. MURALIDHAR [Decided on 21.04.2011 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956 – Increase in authorized share capital – Whether stamp duty is payable on the increased quantum – Held, No. Brief facts: The Petitioner, […]
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930
    RAVINDER RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. [SC] Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S).10364/2006 Altamas Kabir, J. & C Joseph, J[Decided on 10/02/2011]   Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Booking of car – Before delivery of the car the price of the car increased due to increase […]
  • Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N)
    Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N) – Illegal termination- Employer fails to lead evidence that the complainants are not workmen – Award favouring the workmen passed by the industrial adjudicator – Whether correct – Held, yes.  Brief facts: The petitioner employer by these writ petitions impugns separate but identical awards of the Industrial Adjud […]
© 2009 CS Students' Online Club. Promoted by: CIER. CSoC launched on 18th June, 2009
Knowledge Partner: SVJS Knowledge Lab. Pvt. Ltd.
Advisors: BMP Part & Fell. - Portal Managed by: miniMedia
CS Students Online Club & the Club Logo are the registered trademarks of the Club promoters.
Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha