Suspicion of money laundering/terrorist financing

 With a view to preventing banks from being used, intentionally or unintentionally, by criminal elements for money laundering or terrorist financing, the RBI has clarified that whenever there is suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing or when other factors give rise to a belief that the customer does not, in fact, pose a low risk, banks should carry out full scale customer due diligence (CDD) before opening an account.

Filing of Suspicious Transaction Report (STR)

In terms of the guidelines contained in Para 2 (iv) and 8 of the circular RPCD.RRB.BC.NO. 81/03.05.33(E)/2004-05 dated February 18, 2005 a bank should not open an account or close an existing account where the bank  is unable to apply appropriate customer due diligence measures. It is clarified that in the circumstances when a bank believes that it would no longer be satisfied that it knows the true identity of the account holder, the bank should file an STR with Financial Intelligence Unit of India (FIU-IND).

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

 In terms of instructions contained in Para 5 of circular RPCD.CO.RRB.BC.No. 27/03.05.33(E)/2009-10 dated September 29, 2009 on the subject, in the event of an existing customer or the beneficial owner of an existing account, subsequently becoming a PEP, banks should obtain senior management approval to continue the business relationship and subject the account to the CDD measures as applicable to the customers of PEP category including enhanced monitoring on an ongoing basis. It is also applicable to accounts where a PEP is the ultimate beneficial owner. Further, in regard to PEP accounts, it is reiterated that banks should have appropriate ongoing risk management procedures for identifying and applying enhanced CDD to PEPs, customers who are close relatives of PEPs, and accounts of which a PEP is the ultimate beneficial owner.

Principal Officer

The role and responsibilities of the Principal Officer should include overseeing and ensuring overall compliance with regulatory guidelines on KYC/AML/CFT issued from time to time and obligations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, rules and regulations made thereunder, as amended form time to time.

These guidelines are issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Any contravention thereof or non-compliance shall attract penalties under Banking Regulation Act.

Source: rbi.org.in

The Government of India is planning to have regulatory checks on the quality of medical equipments to ensure safety for patients and efficiency of medical devices. The checks will be implemented on all the manufacturers, importers and suppliers of the medical devices where they will be required to get themselves registered with the country’s drug regulatory authority, the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI).

The central government is formulating a new law, the Central Devices Act (CDA) with the aim to regulate the entire medical device industry. Currently the Drugs and Cosmetics Act regulates only 14 medical devices which are primarily concerned to regulate medicines. The step is seen as an extension of the comprehensive amendment to the current drug law and aims to bring all the medical devices under the regulatory preview of the health ministry.

The government is also planning to set up a system where the drug licensing and drug pricing authorities will work in co-ordination to ensure proper market implementation of the price and composition of each drug sold in the country. The process shall involve forming a ‘functional linkage’ between the office of the DCGI and the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA).

Under the current setup, the DCGI approves marketing of a drug and the NPPA is supposed to enforce price control laws, but as the parent ministries of both these outfits are different, DCGI comes under the health ministry, while NPPA is under the chemicals and fertilisers ministry, proper working synergy has remained a major hurdle in regulating the retail drug market.

The Indian pharmaceuticals market is estimated to be about Rs.50,000 crore a year. The prices of a fifth of the medicines are set by the government. For the others, the manufacturers are not allowed to raise prices by more than 10% of the stated maximum retail price in a year.

Source:Hindustan Times Content Team

India has traditionally been associated with outsourcing around the world, but according to a new report, Indian companies have created nearly 60,000 jobs in the United States of America, in addition to investment and acquisition deals worth $26.5 billion.

The report, ‘How America Benefits from Economic Engagement with India’ investigates one specific aspect of globalisation of the American economy, namely, the United States-India business relationship. During 2004-2009, 90 Indian companies made 127 greenfield investments worth $5.5 billion, and created 16,576 jobs in the US.

Greenfield investments are investments made to start a new venture by constructing new operational facilities from the ground up. The top three destination states for greenfield investments were Minnesota, Virginia and Texas, in that order.

It is noteworthy that the software and information technology services sector, which account for bulk of the outsourcing deals, received less than 15% of the total investment. The investments mainly were in mining, manufacturing, and other industries, the report said. The top three states in terms of jobs created were Ohio, Texas, and California, the report said.

During 2004-09, 239 Indian companies made 372 acquisitions in the United States. The five US industrial sectors that received the most greenfield investment were Metals; Software & IT Services; Leisure & Entertainment; industrial machinery, equipment & tools; and financial services, accounting for almost 80% of total greenfield investment in the US.

The report, jointly produced by University of Maryland, India-US World Affairs Institute and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, gives a comprehensive analysis of America’s economic engagement with India during the period 2004 to 2009.

Source: Hindustan Times Content Team

The government has ended the turf war between IRDA and SEBI on the regulation of unit linked insurance products (ULIPs). The products will be regulated by the insurance regulator IRDA.

President Pratibha Patil issued the Ordinance, explaining that the life insurance business shall include any unit-linked policy or scrips or any such instruments. The government has also constituted a high-level committee chaired by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, which will sort out all issues of jurisdiction regarding hybrid products.

In April, SEBI banned 14 life insurance firms from issuing fresh ULIP schemes. However, IRDA asked the life insurers to ignore the SEBI order and the matter was taken to the Finance Ministry, which advised them to move the court. In the meantime, the ministry had asked to maintain the status quo.

ULIPs account for more than 50 per cent of the life insurance business and the money collected from policy holders is invested in equities.

Source: financialexpress.com

The Intellectual Property (IP) office is planning to separate its trademark registry division out of the division which currently deals with patents, trademarks and designs. This move could result in a balanced focus on trademarks as well as patents.

To separate the two offices, the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP), under which the IP office falls, has already shifted some powers of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks related to trademarks to another officer.

Since January 2009, the government has been planning to reform the way the office works and, to cleanse the system of corrupt practices, made most information related to the processing of patents, designs and trademarks accessible online, reducing scope for corruption.

Under the trademark legislation, as it stands now, the government’s power is limited to appointing another officer to discharge some functions of the registrar (or controller general), as the latter may from time to time authorize. But the controller general remains in charge.

The creation of independent and separate trademark and the patent departments has been welcomed by most industry analysts. Particularly in view of the fact that patent litigation in respect of pre and post grant oppositions has significantly increased in India. Hence having an independent head would increase its efficiency. Similarly, the trademark department would also benefit from greater stress upon accountability and transparency.

Source: Hindustan Times Content Team

The Government approved a proposal to draw a loan of USD 100 million (about Rs 450 crore) from the World Bank to promote microfinance in the country.

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) cleared the proposal for on-lending to the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI), which in turn would disburse the funds to the microfinance sector.

“The fund will be used to promote responsible and balanced growth of microfinance outreach, particularly in under-served areas where micro finance penetration is low, thereby serving the larger objective of promoting financial inclusion,” Home Minister P Chidambaram told reporters after the CCEA meeting on Tuesday.

The decision is expected to help broad-base credit disbursals.

Growth in the microfinance sector has been very high in the last few years, with some of the institutions registering 100 per cent year-on-year growth.

Market reports peg the current size of the sector to almost USD 1.5 billion, with the global market size being about USD 50 billion.

Source: ddinews.gov.in

In terms of paragraph 15 of the Master Circular on Operational Guidelines issued to the Primary Dealers on July 1, 2009, RBI is empowered to impose penalties on Primary Dealers for any violation / circumvention of the guidelines or the terms and conditions of the undertaking given by the Primary Dealers. The imposition of penalty on a Primary Dealer is [Read More...]

The government has raised the income tax exemption limit for gratuity payments from the existing Rs3.5 lakh to Rs10 lakh effective 24 May 2010. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has approved a notification setting Rs10 lakh as the maximum amount of gratuity entitled to exemption under sub-clause (iii) of clause (10) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act [Read More...]

The environment ministry has scrapped a proposal for a mega power plant in Chhattisgarh after finding that the construction of the plant started without its mandatory environment clearance. In what appears to be gross irregularity, Jindal Power Limited started work on the 2,400 MW coal-based power plant not at the original site but where a 1,000 MW power plant is [Read More...]

Easy Bill ties up with Life Insurance Company of India (LIC of India) for providing the LIC customers an easy premium paying facility. This service, available at all outlets throughout India, is simple, authentic, and Easy bill will accept all payments whether on time or late.   Easy Bill provides a wide range of services catering to all the ticketing [Read More...]

CSoC Mission: “To be an online guide to budding corporate professionals, to help them with knowledge resources and make them aware of latest profession related & corporate updates.” CSoC Vision: “To be a role-model among online knowledge portals, and create a brand of excellence in pure knowledge sharing with disciple and decorum, in tune with global standards”.

RSS Latest from CSoC Discussion Forum:

  • TRAINING GUIDANCE
    HELLO FRIENDS I AM A CS TRAINEE YOU CAN SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ME.... AND ALSO YOU CAN ASK ME FOR YOUR TRAINING DOUBTS TAKE CARE […]
    CS PREETI CHAUHAN
  • CS EXECUTIVE PROGRAME RESPONSE SHEET
    Hi all, can any one please send me solved response sheet for CS Executive program. My Mail ID is Challashravan@yahoo.co.in […]
    Challa
  • cs executive notes
    plz send me cs executive notes to ma mail id nazima.perky@gmail.com […]
    nazima
  • urgent ( cs professional postel june 2012 papers )
    can any body please send me solved cs professional postel june 2012 papers ( test papers )... i have to send it before 28th feb... i have very less time ... please help me.. if any body has then send it me on my mail :- mayank8382@yahoo.com thanks in advance. […]
    mayank8382
  • Need CC Paper for CS Professional
    Hello, Pls send CC paper (Postal) for CS Professional if anybody have. my e-mail ID is - mnt_agarwal@yahoo.co.in […]
    mnt_agarwal
  • Training overseas
    Dear Friends, I wanted to know whether we can do our training or articleship abroad as I would be moving to Abudhabi next year after my executive exams. Can somebody please give me any suggestions as i want to do the training along with preparing for Finals. Thanks […]
    Rashmi Pisharody
  • cs scanner for executive
    can anyone tell me which scanner i prefer for preparation of executive programme? […]
    sandeepsrj
  • cs attempt for june 2012
    I want to give both the modules for june2012. How could I prepare for it? Can anyone tell me about How could I prepare for this? […]
    sandeepsrj

CSoC Definitions:

CSoC Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate Governance is the culture of managing a corporate entity, whereby compliance with law, procedures, systems, code of ethics and best practices are ensured thus adding value to shareholders and contributing to the well being of all stakeholders.”


CSoC Definition of Compliance Management:
“Compliance Management is that part of management which specializes in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, code of conduct, management polices, systems and secretarial standards in order to achieve the organization objectives legally, ethically and transparently.”

RSS Case Laws

  • Companies Act – Section 560(6)
    R.G.SALES PVT LTD & ANR v. GIRDHARILAL PARASRAMPURIA & ANR [CAL] APO No.149 of 2011 with CP No.448 of 2010 Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta & Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J. [Decided on 15.06.2011] Companies Act – Section 560(6) – Company was struck of the register by ROC – An eviction suit was pending against the company – […]
  • Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest
    UNION OF INDIA v. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING & LEASING (P) LTD [SC] Civil Appeal No. 2005 of 2007, P Sathasivam & A.K. Patnaik, JJ. [Decided on 12/07/2011] Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest – Arbitrator awarded interest – Whether tenable – Held, No Brief facts: On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a […]
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956
    S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [DEL] W.P.(C) 2393/2010 S. MURALIDHAR [Decided on 21.04.2011 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956 – Increase in authorized share capital – Whether stamp duty is payable on the increased quantum – Held, No. Brief facts: The Petitioner, […]
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930
    RAVINDER RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. [SC] Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S).10364/2006 Altamas Kabir, J. & C Joseph, J[Decided on 10/02/2011]   Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Booking of car – Before delivery of the car the price of the car increased due to increase […]
  • Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N)
    Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N) – Illegal termination- Employer fails to lead evidence that the complainants are not workmen – Award favouring the workmen passed by the industrial adjudicator – Whether correct – Held, yes.  Brief facts: The petitioner employer by these writ petitions impugns separate but identical awards of the Industrial Adjud […]
© 2009 CS Students' Online Club. Promoted by: CIER. CSoC launched on 18th June, 2009
Knowledge Partner: SVJS Knowledge Lab. Pvt. Ltd.
Advisors: BMP Part & Fell. - Portal Managed by: miniMedia
CS Students Online Club & the Club Logo are the registered trademarks of the Club promoters.
Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha