CSoC Knowledge Partner

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI ) has recently signed an agreement with M/s Sify Software Limited. As per the revised arrangement the online test for compulsory computer training of the students, which is being presently conducted by M/s Aptech Ltd. will be henceforth conducted by M/s Sify Software Ltd.

To facilitate the mandatory requirement for students having computer knowledge to pass the online test, M/s Sify Software has developed an online testing portal where students can appear for online test and will be able to download their certificates after 15 days of passing of online test. This will ensure that there is no delay in receiving the certificate after clearing the online test. Students can go to the online portal, register for the test and block a centre for appearing in the test. Payment for the online test can be done both in online or offline mode (through branches of SBI using Powerjyoti scheme). Students can register them for the said online test in http://icsi.sifyitest.com.

 The registration for online exemption test from compulsory computer training through the above mentioned online portal is going to start from 19th November, 2011 onwards. Initially M/s Sify Software Ltd. shall be conducting online tests during weekends on Saturdays and at a later period they will extend the benefit in other days also.

 With effect from 1st of February 2012 M/s Sify Software Ltd will be the sole testing authority for ICSI.

The Training & Educational Facilities Committee of the Council has approved the new format of the quarterly report to be submitted by the students. Students undergoing 15 months training or part training with Companies, PCS, MCA,ROC,RD,OL ,Financial Institutions, Law firms, Consultancy firms, IICA or any other organization registered with institute for imparting training are required to submit the quarterly report in the prescribed format. The format is available under the ‘Training’ section on the website of the Institute. The format will be effective from 1st December 2011.

 

Source: www.icsi.edu

Applicability of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011

SEBI vide its Notification No. LAD-NRO/GN/2011-12/24/30181 dated September 23, 2011 notified the New SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 replacing the Takeover Regulations namely SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.

A copy of the new Takeover Regulations is uploaded on the Home page of ICSI Website under the head ‘From the Government/ Regulators’ for reference.

Students are advised to note as under

  1. For December 2011 Examination SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 shall be applicable.
  1. For June, 2012 Examination SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011   shall be applicable.

 

Source: www.icsi.edu

 

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has diluted its earlier decision and allowed companies not filing their updated balance sheets and profits and accounts to the Registrars of Companies (RoCs) to apply for liquidation through a speedy process. Also, directors of the firms can now intimate management changes, consolidations and divisions, changes in share capital without filing / updating their accounts with the RoCs.

Earlier, the ministry had disallowed firms that do not submit their updated accounts from making most other statutory filings.

While the ministry circular three months ago barred such defaulters from making any routine submissions to the RoCs before they update, their annual balance sheets and profit and loss accounts, MCA has now revised its stand to allow RoCs to accept over two dozen types of submission, irrespective of the compliance level of registered firms. If the ministry’s rationale for the earlier decision was to ensure corporate governance and proper compliance by companies, the relaxation is being carried out “in the interest of the stakeholders”.

Talking about the earlier decision, an MCA official explained this was a move to bar fraudsters from misusing the easy exit route, as they will have to furnish the financial details before de- registering the firm.

The current changes, to take effect from September 25, will allow companies to apply for a speedy exit scheme to wind up operations even without updating financial vitals.

Source:  Business Standard

 

A report by the Independent Commission on Banking (ICB), which urged the British government to impose a “ring-fence”: a strict separation between the retail and investment-banking operations of Britain’s banks. The commission, chaired by Sir John Vickers, an independent-minded economist, also called for a big increase in the amount of capital held within these ring-fenced banks as a buffer against losses.

The commission was set up by the coalition government last year. Pleasing both of its constituent parties looked a tough task: before the general election, some Liberal Democrats had called for a complete break-up of Britain’s biggest banks; the Conservatives, the dominant party in the coalition, were less confrontational.

The case for firm measures is difficult to dispute. The bail-out of Royal Bank of Scotland alone required a capital injection of £46 billion ($85 billion) from the public purse in 2008. The assets of Britain’s biggest banks are about 4.5 times bigger than its GDP; in the depths of the crisis, the country found itself in a similar position to Switzerland (the assets of whose two biggest banks were six times as large as the national economy), and Ireland (3.5 times). All faced not only the collapse of banks that were too big to be allowed to fail, but also the frightening prospect of trying to prop up banks that might have proved (and in Ireland’s case were) too big to save.

Yet the commission’s ring-fence proposal remains controversial, not least because it puts Britain at odds with much of the rest of the world. In Europe, universal banking, which combines retail and commercial banking with racier wholesale and investment sorts, is commonplace and likely to persist. In America, which banned universal banking after the Great Depression under the Glass-Steagall act, the division between the two kinds was incrementally weakened for decades, before it was finally scrapped in 1999. During the crisis the Federal Reserve and Treasury forced most of America’s big independent investment banks into arranged marriages with commercial firms. Britain’s exceptionalism in trying to reinvent Glass-Steagall reflects its twin desires to tame banking and allow British banks to compete in global markets.

The ICB proposes that all retail and small-business banking should be conducted by a separate subsidiary, with independent governance and its own padding of extra capital. This is the part of a bank that regulators see as too important to fail. The ICB hopes to keep these bits safe by both strictly limiting what they can do—betting on markets by using derivatives, for instance, is strictly forbidden—and by giving them the capacity to absorb extra losses. The minimum amount of equity (the gold standard of capital) that they will have to hold will be set at 10%. This is a far higher level than the 7% demanded by international rules. On top of that, retail banks will have to hold another 7% to 10% of loss-absorbing capital.

 

These retail markets are, by their nature, largely local, so there seems little chance that foreign banks will take advantage of lower capital requirements in their home countries to flood Britain with mortgages and credit cards. Retail banking in Britain will probably become a lot more boring, quite a bit safer and somewhat less profitable. Customers will hardly notice, though shareholders may well look elsewhere.

Source:www.economist.com

 

The Union Minister of Commerce, Industry and Textiles, Shri Anand Sharma has stressed the need to avoid protectionist tendencies by the developed economies. Speaking to a delegation of the US- Congress and German- Bundestag, the Minister said “crisis leads to inward thinking but protectionism is counter-productive as it deepens recession. Wherever protectionism has been resorted to, it has never helped.” He further said that, there is a need to sensitize the US policy makers about the actual nature of outsourcing as it is well documented that for every job that is outsourced there are higher end jobs created in the outsourcing economies. The Minister emphasised that Indian companies are a major source of employment generation in the US market. ‘We need to engage more not less” the minister added.

The Minister expressed confidence that the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (US GSP) scheme, which expired last December, will be revived soon by the US Congress with full and long term reauthorization. The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) is a program designed to promote economic growth in the developing world by providing preferential duty-free entry for up to 4,800 products from 129 designated beneficiary countries and territories. Citing the adverse impact on employment in vulnerable sectors, the Minister said that US Government has withdrawn the GSP benefit in respect of a number of products from India, e.g. jewellery. However, he pointed out, the benefits have not gone to any LDC beneficiaries but to major trading partners like China and France.

The Minister also assured the legislators of India’s firm commitment to the processes of liberalization and economic reforms. He said that fundamentals of Indian economy are strong and there are a slew of reforms measure in the pipeline like National Manufacturing policy and FDI in retail that will further prop up the growth trajectory. Shri Sharma remained optimistic of continued high GDP growth rate. “FDI is looking good after a disappointing last year. We hope to make up for the lost ground this year”.

During the meeting the Commerce Minister informed that Germany and US are India’s big trading partners. USA is one of the largest trading partner and a leading export destination.

Source: pib.nic.in

A Parliamentary Panel has asked the Government to devise a mechanism to ensure a minimum assured/guaranteed return to subscribers of New Pension System (NPS).

In the absence of such a guarantee/assurance, the NPS cannot justifiably claim to provide ‘old age income security’, the Standing Committee on Finance said in its report on the PFRDA Bill, 2011. The report was tabled in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday.

This minimum assured return should be provided to ensure that the NPS subscribers are not at any disadvantage vis-à-vis other pensioners. The minimum rate of return on the contributions to the pension fund should not be less than the interest rate on employee provident fund scheme, the House Panel headed by Mr. Yashwant Sinha said. Any shortfall on this count (providing minimum assured return) should be made good from the Budget, the report said.

The Standing Committee has also recommended that the foreign direct investment (FDI) in the pension sector be capped at 26 per cent. The Government favours this.

Source: Business Line

If a person is NRI or PIO, she/he can, without the permission from the Reserve Bank, open, hold and maintain the different types of accounts given below with an Authorised Dealer in India, i.e., a bank authorised to deal in foreign exchange. NRO Savings accounts can also be maintained with the Post Offices in India. Opening of accounts by individuals/entities of Bangladesh / Pakistan nationality requires prior approval of the Reserve Bank. All such requests may be referred to the Chief General Manager-in-Charge, Foreign Exchange Department, Foreign Investment Division, Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, Mumbai – 400 001.

Types of accounts which can be maintained by an NRI / PIO in India

  1. Non-Resident (Ordinary) Rupee Account (NRO Account)
  2. Non-Resident (External) Rupee Account (NRE Account)
  3. Foreign Currency Non Resident (Bank) Account – FCNR (B) Account

Investment Facilities available to NRIs/ PIOs in India

Investments made by NRIs/PIOs can be on a repatriation or Non-repatriation basis.

NRI may, without limit, purchase on repatriation basis:

  • Government dated securities / Treasury bills
  • Units of domestic mutual funds;
  • Bonds issued by a public sector undertaking (PSU) in India.
  • Non-convertible debentures of a company incorporated in India.
  • Perpetual debt instruments and debt capital instruments issued by banks in India.
  • Shares in Public Sector Enterprises being dis-invested by the Government of India, provided the purchase is in accordance with the terms and conditions stipulated in the notice inviting bids.
  • Shares and convertible debentures of Indian companies under the FDI scheme (including automatic route & FIPB), subject to the terms and conditions specified in Schedule 1 to the FEMA Notification No. 20/2000- RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time.
  • Shares and convertible debentures of Indian companies through stock exchange under Portfolio Investment Scheme, subject to the terms and conditions specified in Schedule 3 to the FEMA Notification No. 20/2000- RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time.

NRI may, without limit, purchase on non-repatriation basis:

  • Government dated securities / Treasury bills
  • Units of domestic mutual funds
  • Units of Money Market Mutual Funds
  • National Plan/Savings Certificates
  • Non-convertible debentures of a company incorporated in India
  • Shares and convertible debentures of Indian companies through stock exchange under Portfolio Investment Scheme, subject to the terms and conditions specified in Schedules 3 and 4 to the FEMA Notification No. 20/2000- RB dated May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time.
  • Exchange traded derivative contracts approved by the SEBI, from time to time, out of INR funds held in India on non-repatriable basis, subject to the limits prescribed by the SEBI.

Note:

NRIs are not permitted to invest in small savings or Public Provident Fund (PPF). Investment in immovable property by NRIs/PIOs are also allowed, based on few conditions as laid down by Reserve Bank of India.

Facilities to returning NRIs/PIO

Returning NRIs/PIO may continue to hold, own, transfer or invest in foreign currency, foreign security or any immovable property situated outside India, if such currency, security or property was acquired, held or owned when resident outside India

An individual resident can borrow sum not exceeding USD 250,000 or its equivalent from his close relatives staying outside India, subject to the conditions that:

-         the minimum maturity period of the loan is one year

-         the loan is free of interest; and

-         the amount of loan is received by inward remittance in free foreign exchange through normal banking channels or by debit to the NRE/FCNR account of the NRI.

Source: http://www.rbi.org.in/

The Service Tax Rules, 1994 is amended to insert a clause that every assessee shall submit the half yearly return electronically. This shall come into force on the 01st day of October 2011.

Source: http://taxguru.in

The provisions of section 370 and 372 have been combined with Section 372

Company can’t directly or indirectly:

1. Make any loan, guarantee /provide security to any body corporate.

2. Acquire securities by way of subscription or otherwise of any body corporate.

3. Exceeding 60 % of aggregate of its paid up capital and free resaves.

4. 100% of free reserves whichever is more.

Provisions Regarding the above :

Within prescribed limits Beyond prescribed limits
Pass a resolution at the board meeting Obtain prior approval of shareholder by way of special resolution (rule4 of co passing of resolution by Postal ballot Rules 2001;

 

Obtain prior approval of concern public financial institution in case of default made in payment of a loan. Obtain prior approval of  concern public financial institution;

Pass a resolution at BM

Special resolution  must specify -

1. Specific limits

2. Particulars of body corporate.

3. Propose of investment loans and security.

Board may give guarantee without being authorize by Special Resolution (not include loans and others) -

1. A resolution passed at board meeting

2. Due to exceptional circumstances

3. The resolution of board is confirmed within 12 months of AGM Or GM whichever is earlier.

For the loans given by the company -

a) Its rate of interest should be lower than bank rate of RBI.

b) All the particulars regarding loans and investments should be recorded within 7 days of transactions and should be kept open for inspection by any member.

c) Company in default u/s 58A cant make any investment, loans until such default continues.

Exceptions -

1. Banking / Insurance/ house financing/ industrial financing.

2. A company whose principle business is acquisition of shares, debentures, stocks and securities.

3. A private company.

4. The company whose shares is allotted in pursuance of sec 81(1)(a).

5. A loan/guarantee by holding co to its subsidiary company for acquisition.

Penalties -

1. Rs. 50000 or Rs . 50000 with imprisonment.

2. Rs. 5000 for non maintenance of register for Rs. 500 /day.

Source: www.caclubindia.com

CSoC Mission: “To be an online guide to budding corporate professionals, to help them with knowledge resources and make them aware of latest profession related & corporate updates.” CSoC Vision: “To be a role-model among online knowledge portals, and create a brand of excellence in pure knowledge sharing with disciple and decorum, in tune with global standards”.

RSS Latest from CSoC Discussion Forum:

  • TEST paper 5/2009
    Hi All, i need your help for solving some case laws in Test Paper 5/2009. Question number 5 and 6 . Can anyone of you give me idea under which topic they will be covered. ITS VERY URGENT I AM ONLY SHORT THESE TWO QUESTIONS...... LAST DATE OF SUMBIMSSION IS VERY CLOSE. Regards Suraj […]
    surajvictor
  • Test papers for CS aptech course
    Dear Freinds, Plz send me d test papers with solution for Cs aptech Training... my mail ID:sweetushlu0621@gmail.com Plz do d needful... Thax in advace to al.... […]
    Anita S V
  • 25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....CSoC now has 25,000 MEMBERS...............
    25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....25,000....CSoC now has 25,000 MEMBERS............... Launched on 18th June, 2009 with four members now CS Students' Online Club touched 25,000 Members record, ranking one of the largest […]
    Club Exe
  • Please dont respond to fake / meaningless topic posts
    Please dont repond to fake / meaningless topic posts. Dont send emails to such posters / CSoC Members. This has been reminded by the CSoC many times. […]
    Club Exe
  • solved test papers
    sir kindly send me cs executive solved test papers of both modules on my email id karthikraj619@gmail.com […]
    karthikraj619
  • Response Executive
    Please send answers for executive responses sheet to me at : rnpandore1974@gmail.com Thanks […]
    rnpandore
  • Cs professional scanners
    If any one want Latest 25 exams solved scanners of cs professional in book form . Contact at : addicted587 @ gmail.com […]
    Anonymous
  • Executive notes
    hi can nyone pls send me imp topics and notes of exec programme...on my id suchi0883@gmail.com […]
    Suchitaagarwal

CSoC Definitions:

CSoC Definition of Corporate Governance:
“Corporate Governance is the culture of managing a corporate entity, whereby compliance with law, procedures, systems, code of ethics and best practices are ensured thus adding value to shareholders and contributing to the well being of all stakeholders.”


CSoC Definition of Compliance Management:
“Compliance Management is that part of management which specializes in compliance with laws, rules, regulations, code of conduct, management polices, systems and secretarial standards in order to achieve the organization objectives legally, ethically and transparently.”

RSS Case Laws

  • Companies Act – Section 560(6)
    R.G.SALES PVT LTD & ANR v. GIRDHARILAL PARASRAMPURIA & ANR [CAL] APO No.149 of 2011 with CP No.448 of 2010 Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta & Syamal Kanti Chakrabarti, J. [Decided on 15.06.2011] Companies Act – Section 560(6) – Company was struck of the register by ROC – An eviction suit was pending against the company – […]
  • Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest
    UNION OF INDIA v. KRAFTERS ENGINEERING & LEASING (P) LTD [SC] Civil Appeal No. 2005 of 2007, P Sathasivam & A.K. Patnaik, JJ. [Decided on 12/07/2011] Arbitration Act, 1940 – Contract prohibited payment of interest – Arbitrator awarded interest – Whether tenable – Held, No Brief facts: On 16.05.1988, the respondent was awarded with a […]
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956
    S. E. INVESTMENTS LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [DEL] W.P.(C) 2393/2010 S. MURALIDHAR [Decided on 21.04.2011 Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (as applicable to Delhi) read with the Companies Act, 1956 – Increase in authorized share capital – Whether stamp duty is payable on the increased quantum – Held, No. Brief facts: The Petitioner, […]
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930
    RAVINDER RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. [SC] Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S).10364/2006 Altamas Kabir, J. & C Joseph, J[Decided on 10/02/2011]   Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Booking of car – Before delivery of the car the price of the car increased due to increase […]
  • Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N)
    Industrial Dispute Act – Sections 2(s), 25(N) – Illegal termination- Employer fails to lead evidence that the complainants are not workmen – Award favouring the workmen passed by the industrial adjudicator – Whether correct – Held, yes.  Brief facts: The petitioner employer by these writ petitions impugns separate but identical awards of the Industrial Adjud […]
© 2009 CS Students' Online Club. Promoted by: CIER. CSoC launched on 18th June, 2009
Knowledge Partner: SVJS Knowledge Lab. Pvt. Ltd.
Advisors: BMP Part & Fell. - Portal Managed by: miniMedia
CS Students Online Club & the Club Logo are the registered trademarks of the Club promoters.
Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha